Society For Risk Analysis Annual Meeting 2017
Session Schedule & Abstracts
* Disclaimer: All presentations represent the views of the authors, and not the organizations that support their research. Please apply the standard disclaimer that any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in abstracts, posters, and presentations at the meeting are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other organization or agency. Meeting attendees and authors should be aware that this disclaimer is intended to apply to all abstracts contained in this document. Authors who wish to emphasize this disclaimer should do so in their presentation or poster. In an effort to make the abstracts as concise as possible and easy for meeting participants to read, the abstracts have been formatted such that they exclude references to papers, affiliations, and/or funding sources. Authors who wish to provide attendees with this information should do so in their presentation or poster.
|Chair(s): Steve Gibb email@example.com
Sponsored by Applied Risk Management Specialty Group
|Under the June 2016 amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act, EPA has pledged to use broadly accepted agency risk assessment guidance and methods when evaluating new and existing chemicals. It has sought public comment on key science terms such as weight of evidence and best available science. However, pledges and the actions that follow are not always consistent. This session will tap the expertise of consultants, academics, editors and others in discussing how EPAâ€™s risk choices seem to be in-, or out-of-line with past agency practices. In particular, the session will address susceptible subpopulations such as children and workers and how they are accounted for.|
Steve Gibb, Bloomberg BNA; Tracey Woodruff, UCSF; Jack Fowle, Science to Inform; and Tom Burke, Johns Hopkins (invited).
[back to schedule]