Society For Risk Analysis Annual Meeting 2017
Session Schedule & Abstracts
* Disclaimer: All presentations represent the views of the authors, and not the organizations that support their research. Please apply the standard disclaimer that any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in abstracts, posters, and presentations at the meeting are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other organization or agency. Meeting attendees and authors should be aware that this disclaimer is intended to apply to all abstracts contained in this document. Authors who wish to emphasize this disclaimer should do so in their presentation or poster. In an effort to make the abstracts as concise as possible and easy for meeting participants to read, the abstracts have been formatted such that they exclude references to papers, affiliations, and/or funding sources. Authors who wish to provide attendees with this information should do so in their presentation or poster.
|Chair(s): Patricia Nance, Frederic Bouder firstname.lastname@example.org
Sponsored by Engineering and Infrastructure Specialty Group
|Over the years SRA members have established a growing number of specialty groups, which cover most aspects of risk analysis from various facets of risk assessment down to management, communication and policy stages. Specific disciplinary approaches (e.g. cost/benefit analysis) have been included as well as different applications of risk analysis (e.g. Nanotechnology, occupational health and safety, defense, security, microbiology etc.). This movement illustrates the breadth of knowledge focus and interests of the Society. A number of questions may be asked: do new issues require new specialty groups to be established? And how effective are existing Specialty groups? Most specialty groups have been particularly active in the management of the annual program, and for awarding distinctions. Joint mixers have also become a valuable feature of the annual meeting, therefore stimulating exchanges among specialty groups. Can we learn from other promising initiatives? Should plans be made to make specialty groups even more attractive and relevant? This panel discussion will focus on substance issues of risk analysis, compare experiences â€“ what we have in common and what are the differences, as well stimulate innovative thinking to explore ways of making this central feature of SRA even more effective.|
[back to schedule]